Social Security Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Social Security - Research Paper typesetters caseThis paper supports the view that affectionate guarantor should not be privatized. Supporting points The very first causality not to privatize social warrantor system this go forth hinder the realization of the social security objectives and goals. This implies that over the next forty seven years, privatization is liable(predicate) to reduce the make headway levels by 44% as comp bed to the level of 2005 (Max, 2005). In addition, Max, (2005) tells us that implementation of privatization system is expensive. The costs that would be spent in the passage process when coming up with sassy personal account and continuing to offer benefits to recipients of social security would require about $2 trillion. Privatization of social security will as well hurt the parsimony. As pointed out by Orszag and Diamond (2005) this is because the high costs would be involved in the privatizing the accounts be likely to reduce the growth of eco nomy (Orszag and Diamond, 2005). This implies that social security fund would be destabilized. Centralized deficits and debts will increase as a result of privatizing social security. These are likely to reduce long-term growth of the economy and the amount of the funds that is available for retirement of booming new generation. The Center on Budget and insurance Priorities carried out an analysis which showed that the Presidents proposal was to add $1 trillion in the new federal budget while implementing privatization in the first decade. The following decade was to use 3.5 trillion and frequently more trillions afterward. Accordingly, this would hurt the economy badly as noted by Orszag and Diamond (2005). The fact that ill-tempered insurance covers such as disability and survivors insurance which are offered by social security will decline when the private accounts become operational is a notable reason to oppose privatization. As explained by Max (2005) privatizing social sec urity also means that retirement funds are put on the stock market. This weakens the system of theme retirement through potentially risky savings. The retirement savings are moved from a simple and an easy structure into a complex structure of investment that has a portfolio and shares of stock market which are not easy to understand and more risky to deal with. In addition, disproportionate returns are created by private accounts because individuals with higher income have more money and their risks for investment yields are higher as compared to workers who have low and moderate income. Some countries have witnessed negative effects of privatizing their national retirement schemes. For example, in the United Kingdom, the private retirement account started in 1988 and averagely 43% of the return on their investments is spent on marketing fees and management costs (Krugman, 2004). This means much of fund which is supposed to benefit contributors is used to run the privatized social security system. Such a scenario should be avoided completely. In his argument against privatization of social security Max (2005) warns that during an economic crisis, privatization is very disastrous to people who make their contributions to the social security. The households lose intimately of their properties when there is an economic crisis because their investments are traded on the stock exchange. Banks are enriched by